Prediction of Neal Skupski vs Ryan Stotland Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Skupski vs R. Stotland

Neal Skupski
GBR
l
w
w
l
w
l
l
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
35
Age
42
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Ryan Stotland
ISV
l
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
35
Age
42
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Skupski 1 - 0 Stotland
They have played 2 sets in total, with Neal Skupski winning 2 and Ryan Stotland winning 0. The last match between Neal Skupski and Ryan Stotland was at the The LTA Hester Trophy - Manchester, 16-07-2007, Round: Q1, Surface: Grass, with Neal Skupski getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Skupski | 1 |
| Stotland | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) The LTA Hester Trophy - Manchester(07-16-07)
Neal Skupski
6
6
Ryan Stotland
3
4
N. Skupski vs R. Stotland H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 48.15% (26-28) | Career Total W/L | 33.33% (3-6) |
| 1 | Grass | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Skupski vs R. Stotland Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Neal Skupski has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Ryan Stotland has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Neal Skupski, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ryan Stotland has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Neal Skupski has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ryan Stotland has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Neal Skupski has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Ryan Stotland winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Neal Skupski has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 13/10), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 6/9). Ryan Stotland has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 2/1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/3).
- Player level: In the last year, Neal Skupski has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Ryan Stotland has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Neal Skupski winning 1 times and Ryan Stotland being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Neal Skupski winning 2 and Ryan Stotland winning 0.
- The last match between Neal Skupski and Ryan Stotland was at the The LTA Hester Trophy - Manchester, 16-07-2007, Round: Q1, Surface: Grass, with Neal Skupski getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Neal Skupski has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Ryan Stotland has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Neal Skupski has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ryan Stotland has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Neal Skupski has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ryan Stotland has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Neal Skupski vs Ryan Stotland Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Skupski vs R. Stotland H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Skupski 0%, Stotland 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Skupski 0%, Stotland 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Skupski 0%, Stotland 0%.
N. Skupski Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-6(2) 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 1-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
R. Stotland Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 3-6 6-4 7-6(5) | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | ||

N. Skupski vs R. Stotland Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48.15% (26/28) | YTD Win/Loss | 33.33% (3/6) |
| 47.97% (59/64) | Sets Win/Loss | 38.10% (8/13) |
| 48.26% (541/580) | Games Win/Loss | 45.79% (87/103) |
| 45.45% (5/6) | Hard Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Clay Win/Loss | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 53.85% (14/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 40.00% (6/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 27 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.04 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 23 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 457.93 | Average Opponent Rank | 256 |
| 57% (155/271) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 68% (105/155) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (52/116) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 20% (2/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 25% (57/225) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45.45% (5/6) | Challenger W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 52.50% (21/19) | Futures W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 48% (26/54) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (3/9) |
| 77% (10/13) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 53% (8/15) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 82% (28/23) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (4/2) |
| 18% (28/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (4/2) |
| 12% (26/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (5/1) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Sun, 23 Nov, 03:00 PM
PredictionMon, 24 Nov, 02:30 AM
PredictionSun, 23 Nov, 05:30 PM
PredictionSun, 23 Nov, 02:05 PM
PredictionSun, 23 Nov, 02:30 PM
PredictionSun, 23 Nov, 03:30 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

22 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Leolia Jeanjean vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Talia Gibson Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Flavio Cobolli vs Zizou Bergs Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Jeline Vandromme Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Maria Lourdes Carle vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
14:00
H2H 0-0
14:30
H2H 0-0
17:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Bogota Challenger
Colombia
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Hersonissos 7 Challenger
Greece
Islamabad Challenger
Pakistan
Maia Challenger
Portugal
Manama 2 Challenger
Bahrain
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Playford Challenger
Australia
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Temuco Challenger
Chile
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 La Paz
Bolivia
M15 Madrid
Spain
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Phan Thiet
Vietnam
M15 Ribeirao Preto
Brazil
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M15 Tallahassee
United States
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Bhopal
India
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Hradec Kralove
Czech Republic
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal